When contracts are being negotiated, often not much attention is paid to the machinery for resolving disputes. That’s dangerous. You took the trouble to negotiate the terms. If you need those terms to be enforced with more than persuasion, that machinery is what does it.
In the PSC, the parties commit to resolve any disputes ‘in a speedy and proportionate manner.’ There is a 3-step process. Alongside the contractual steps, payment disputes can be resolved temporarily by adjudication, which comes from the law, not the contract.
The public works contracts limit the project board to resolving disputes that have already started. (I’ll write another post about what it takes for a disagreement to become a dispute.) And not even all disputes, only disputed determinations of contractor claims. My experience is that the project boards (with or without standing conciliators in the chair) have not succeeded in resolving many disputes.
The PSC project board has a broader role: ‘seeking to minimise the impact of disagreements and disputes’ on performance. The members —
- if agreed by both parties, ‘discuss any area of disagreement in an effort to prevent it becoming a dispute’ and
- attempt to resolve any dispute referred to it by either party.
If there is a project board, there is to be a ‘standing conciliator’ who may attend and chair the project board if the parties agree that.
The second step is conciliation, which is for actual disputes. Any dispute which has not been referred to adjudication can be referred to conciliation. Conciliation is a hybrid process. It is confidential. It works best as mediation — a independent person helping the parties to negotiate an agreed settlement. The RIAI guidance says conciliation is mediation. In a general sense I agree, but I think it’s not mediation within the Mediation Act 2017.
Conciliation has an extra element. If the parties can’t settle the dispute by negotiation, the conciliator makes a recommendation. The recommendation is usually not binding: either party can reject it within a stated period. But the PSC, like the public works contract, makes a conciliator’s recommendation temporarily binding. If the conciliator recommends that one party pay money to the other, the money has to be paid. The dispute isn’t over, and can still go on to arbitration. If the outcome of the arbitration is that the party who got the money wasn’t owed it, or all of it, the overpayment has to be repaid.
In the public works contracts, there are two conditions that the party who ‘won’ at conciliation must satisfy before getting the money. It must refer the dispute on to arbitration. And it must provide a bond for the full amount being paid. The bond secures the obligation to repay this amount, or some if it, if there is a different outcome in arbitration.
Suggested tweak: go back to non-binding conciliation and use it to prevent disputes
The PSC’s sponsors have wisely set up a standing committee to manage the contract and make amendments. Here is a suggestion.
A multi-tier process makes sense, including the provision for addressing disagreements before they become disputes. This follows a current trend in standard contracts, with a focus on avoiding as well as deciding disputes. For instance, the 2017 2nd edition of the FIDIC red, yellow, and silver books have given the former dispute adjudication boards the new title dispute avoidance and adjudication boards. The DAB has become the DAAB. As well as adjudicating disputes as part of the formal process, the DAAB may, if jointly requested by the parties, help them resolve any ‘issue or disagreement,’ and hold informal discussions.
The NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract has optional clauses for referral of disputes to senior representatives (similar to the project board). There is also an option W3 which requires that ‘potential disputes’ be first referred to a dispute avoidance board, whose job is to make a ‘recommendation for resolving’ potential disputes before they become disputes. The dispute cannot be referred to litigation or arbitration unless a recommendation has been made and rejected by a party.
It seems to me that conciliation could be similarly extended to issues before they become disputes. It could be deployed as a dispute avoidance device, rather than to give temporarily binding decisions — there adjudication for that.
Here is some suggested drafting that:
- replaces the project board with senior representatives’ meetings, and adds clarification to their role in addressing issues that may or may not yet have become disputes
- provides for voluntary, non-binding conciliation of these issues
- pauses arbitration for mediation of disputes that have not been either to conciliation or adjudication.
13. AVOIDING AND RESOLVING DISPUTES
13.1 Negotiated resolution
The parties agree to use their best endeavours to resolve any disputes and issues that may arise between them in a speedy and proportionate matter.
Either party may call a special meeting for the purpose of either or both—
resolving an identified issue about which the parties disagree, or about which the party calling the meeting believes that they may disagree
discussing how to minimise the issue’s effect on performance of the Contract.
The parties shall see to it that the meeting takes place within two weeks after one of them has requested it, and is attended by their respective senior representatives (that is, the chief executive or most senior executive in Ireland or another senior executive designated by him or her). The parties shall act reasonably in requesting and providing proposals and information before the meeting. The Employer’s Representative, the Contractor’s representative, others whose attendance may be helpful, and the standing conciliator (if the parties appoint one), or any of them, may attend to assist the parties if both parties agree. The meeting, and information provided for the meeting, shall be without prejudice. Any agreement shall be put in writing and signed on behalf of both parties.
13.2 Adjudication and conciliation
Either party may refer a dispute relating to payment to adjudication at any time under the Construction Contracts Act 2013. If a dispute between the parties is referred to adjudication, any conciliation relating to that dispute shall stand adjourned.
Any issue that —
has been referred to a special meeting of senior representatives and not resolved by written agreement within two weeks after the meeting was called and
is not a dispute referred to adjudication
may be referred by either party to conciliation to be conducted in accordance with the Engineers Ireland Conciliation Procedure 2013. [References in the Conciliation Procedure to ‘dispute’ are taken to include an issue so referred.] Any recommendation shall become final and binding unless a notice of dissatisfaction is given by either party to the other within 21 days of receipt of the recommendation.
Conciliation shall be conducted on a without prejudice basis. This applies to a recommendation to which a timely notice of dissatisfaction is issued.
A conciliator appointed under clause 13.1.2 or 13.2.2 shall act as conciliator for all issues referred to conciliation unless the parties agree otherwise or the conciliator is unwilling or unable to act. The parties may jointly terminate the appointment of a conciliator and appoint a replacement.
13.3 Arbitration and mediation